Report Inappropriate Comments

OK, Robert Coker, I admit it--I erred...I retired in 1997--not 1967 (I always get the 6 mixed up with the 9), but hats off to you for pointing my mistake out. Of course, that calculation was wrong; it was prediated on faulty number...Plus, if I'd retired in 1967, God knows how old I'd be, if even alive today...No, the nos. are 'retired in 1997" after 30 years of teaching, and yes, the salary was correct. But don't throw the baby out with the bath water..the rest of my argument was correct, in terms of what I realized in my real estate career...So, recrunch the nos. and relax and furthermore, will you be my editor for future work?

To clarify for all: I retired in 1997, having begun in 1967 (that's where that no. comes from!)