Report Inappropriate Comments

They don't want taxpayers to shell out $8 per household to create jobs in Warwick because we already pay too much? Solomon said the cost is not that simple. I didn't hear Tax Assessor contradict her Math. How much is the unemployment and foreclosures costing us? The council is worried about saving the taxpayers money. Great argument. Great idea.

So why do some of us have to pay extra on a sewar bill while others keep pumping out failed cesspools you can smell when the wind blows the right way? I want the council to vote on mandatory connection so EVERYONE pays something. Why do we pay a Superintendent of schools 2 1/2 times more than the mayor and the Superintendtent is hardly ever here? Why do we pay over 60% of the city budget to the school district when enrollment is down? Why doesn't the airport pay the lost property taxes everytime they take a house or business off the rolls?

Tell you what? How about if the airport actually pays their taxes, and we get rid of the Superintendent and school committee and we actually have sewars throughout the city instead of living like a third world country so WSA can pay back the city the $6million they owe. Then we can afford all the creative ideas the council can shoot down and not worry about $8 a household for 5 years to get people working.

From: Vella-Wilkinson bats 2 for 3, measure to stimulate construction jobs fails

Please explain the inappropriate content below.