Report Inappropriate Comments

Mr Maloney.

It's simple. Less students should mean less expense or at the same expense since other expenses go up.

You talk about the city's level funding of the school department but the school departemnt surpuses.

You failed to mention the fact that the school committee requested tax increases; $6 million last year and $4 million this year. Luckly the council didn't grant your request.

Isn't it true that when the school committee did get the $6 million they sued for it? Lucky the court saw the folly of the suit.

Isn't it true that the f cranston school departemnt's budget is much lower than warwick while there are less students and buildings.

Oh, let's see how much the settlement with the superintendent will cost the school department. I sure the agreeemnt will be confidential so the details will taxpayersbe hidden from the yaxpayer. By the way, the way the School Committee treated the superintendent was shameful.

Mr. Maloney, you can spin your position as much as you want but people are smarter than you think. I've read comments that are just not true. I've read your comment that the enrollment is 12,000 when it's barely 10,000. Maybe your using weighting figures as you like weighting. You said the city has raised taxes to the maximum for the last 10 years and that is completely false. The increase this year was 2.5%. Why are you trying to mislead the public with the blatently false statement.

From: City looks to finish fiscal year with $1.7M surplus

Please explain the inappropriate content below.