Report Inappropriate Comments

This is unbelieveable. The School Committee won't spend $25,000 on mentor background checks due to the 'cost'. But it will continue to spend an entire year's contract amount of $ 165,225 for an inactive school superintendent. Is the Warwick School Committee just not happy with Superintendent Horoschak's performance & planning to allow his contract to expire? Warwick taxpayers/officials/parents don't know because the School Committee doesn't address the issue in any public session. If 'educating children is their priority' the Warwick School Committee needs more oversight, especially when it concerns money matters.

From: No movement on superintendent since Horoschak placed on leave

Please explain the inappropriate content below.