Report Inappropriate Comments

For the record, I think the School Committee has done some good things (dealing with declining school population and some bad things suing the city).

My only question is what is the financial settlement. That is not a personnel matter. It is a personnelo matter becausethe School Committee made it one. . You could have offer the settlement, kept the personnel matter secret and make the financial payout public.

This lack of acccountability is upsetting. Oh by the way. Did the School Committee hire legal counsel? I thought the School department had its own in house counsel who was handling the case. Was special counsel hired? Is the in house counsel being paid extra for the defending the School Committee? This is what upsets me. The rationale for settling is because of legal fees when youhave in house counsel as well as the fact that the financial terms of the agreement could have be public. No accountability or transparancy.

From: Agreement reached, Horoschak retires as superintendent

Please explain the inappropriate content below.