Report Inappropriate Comments

@David64:

If you truly believe that my posts at 11:19AM and 11:39AM on 4/14/13 are "nonsense" or are somehow "bigoted" and "pious," as you so indicate, then you'll have no problem providing a fact-based, point-by-point rebuttal of what I wrote on this comment string and in the essay, "The Case for Limiting Government Recognition to Traditional Relationships," which is linked here:

http:\\marriage-onemanandonewoman.blogspot.com

Further, you'll have no problem doing so, using peer-reviewed references, as I did, originating from major universities and research organizations - none of which oppose gay marriage or gay rights.

If you can't or won't and instead choose to hide behind the intellectually dishonest invective and admoninem attack in your post, then it will only prove what I and millions of others already know, which is that there's no rational, logical, or factual argument in favor of gay marriage, except a selfish and self-serving desire that's devoid of any care about the damage it will cause.

From: Marriage equality endorsed at emotional, one-sided hearing

Please explain the inappropriate content below.