Report Inappropriate Comments

Norm 88, you are mistaken as far as tax increases go. if you look on the city website you will see that over the past 5 years every tax increase was UNDER the max. last 2 years increase was around 1.5% with the max being 4%. I am advocating no opinion as to the need for ANY increase but just advocating for using the correct info if you are goint to comment at all.

JohnStark, your last comment was a case in double speak. you agree that we should not subsidize waterfront landowners (a point I fully agree with you on) then you go on to rip other "taker subsidies" then you state that a house with a replacement cost of $100k should not be paying high premiums. My question is shouldn't rates be set by the market? and if so who are you to decide that they should not pay high premiums, shouldn't the market set those rates. by you trashing "taker subsidies" you sound like a free market supporter, and therefore you should support the insurance companies setting rates at the market and not what you think is "exorbitant". Correct?

From: Official: Delayed flood rates not answer

Please explain the inappropriate content below.