Today whether it is in Washington or our own backyard, political parties have embarked on a campaign to attack one another in a very personal destructive manner. Even worse, ideas that are good are derailed simply because the opposing party does not want that person to succeed. Frankly American’s are sick of this game, yet Warwick GOP chairman Danny Hall is taking that same approach. In an email message sent by RIGOP Volunteer Coordinator, Eileen Grossman to all Rhode Island Republicans, Mr. Hall writes, “We as a committee and fellow Republicans can no longer stand on the side lines and watch our mayor [Scott Avedisian] continue to take cheap shots. It’s about time we ... take some shots of our own”. Now, if Mr. Hall wishes to engage in a public policy debate on fiscal matters related to the budget, I don’t think anyone would fault him. However, that’s not what he is advocating. In organizing this campaign he has targeted several prominent Warwick conservative activists including me on his hit list. Simply put his strategy is to discredit anyone who disagrees with the mayor’s tax and spend fiscal policy. Why else would his attack on former Warwick Republican mayoral candidate Richard Langseth be so disparaging? He writes, “Richard Langseth couldn’t run a Del’s lemonade stand ... but yet he feels he can run the City of Warwick better.” Instead of targeting him for a smear campaign, Mr. Hall should be congratulating independent Rob Cote for getting Warwick citizens involved with their government by organizing the car tax protest and he should be recruiting him to run for office as a conservative Republican. I guess advocating for cutting spending to balance the budget instead of raising taxes, is not the type of fiscal policy supported by Chairman Hall and the Warwick Republican Party. Take it from me; it surely isn’t supported by the Warwick Democrat Party. One person can’t have all the answers and clearly the facts demonstrate that the mayor’s fiscal policies are not addressing the city’s most pressing budgetary issues. Local tax dollars appropriated to support the city budget have increased over 50 percent since 2007 while only 4 percent for schools. City spending is at an all time high and for the first time under the mayor’s administration incurred a deficit in the last fiscal year. School spending is below 2008 levels. The Warwick Beacon recently reported that Mayor Avedisian admitted that the city “need(s) to address the pension problem now” since it cannot sustain future required pension contributions. Yet the pension reforms just enacted by the mayor did nothing to reduce the combined approximate $600 million unfunded pension and healthcare liability in the city. Warwick Democrats are just as culpable as the Republicans. Having a majority of members in office for years and the power to make change, they have done little to solve fiscal problems because most have adopted the “go-along to get along” philosophy and do not have the courage to make difficult decisions. We can’t sustain that way of thinking any longer. Conservative fiscal philosophy must override party affiliation even if, as in Mr. Langseth case and mine, it isolates us from the tax and spend philosophy of both of our parties. What we must continue to do is to try to change that mind set in each party. Mr. Hall’s problem is that he is conflicted between thinking for himself and pleasing the old Republican soldiers on the city committee who believe their job is to protect the mayor’s spending policies without question, even when it has been proven they clearly are not working. It’s too bad Mr. Hall has acquiesced to this distorted thinking because on occasion, he has shown signs of independence needed to fix the city’s problems. Last month after witnessing my speech at the car tax revolt taking on council members from each party, he wrote to me stating, “Bob, we may have our differences and may not agree on every issue but I feel I owe you an apology. Let me know how I can help”. He can help by moving his party more towards a fiscal conservative approach and distinguish the Republican party from the Democrat party in Warwick. Today there practically is no difference. Mr. Hall should contact the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition or read the blog Anchorrising.com to better understand the type of fiscal conservative platform needed to fix Warwick’s problems And finally he should focus attention on the issues and more importantly solutions to the fiscal problems plaguing our city and not be afraid to question current policy, instead of embarking on a plan to personally attack the few fiscal conservatives left in the city.
Robert Cushman (Cushmanr@cox.net) is a Democrat former Warwick City Councilman and former school committee Chairman.





I would like to remind Mr. Hall that any small business has its challenges, including running a Del's cart First of all you have to keep your money straight, make the correct change, and not give half of your product away to city workers who drive up in official vehicles. If you don't make a profit as a Del's rep your cart is taken away and given to somebody who can run a sharp operation.
I personally have no desire to run a Del's cart. But, I would never knock a person who is trying to make a living doing so. Every job is precious. We are all spokes in the wheel of our fragile economy.
Perhaps Mr. Hall would like to join me in a discussion on how to create jobs here in Warwick? That's what the people want to hear!
Mr. Langseth, You are more than welcome to give me a call anytime as is anyone else 374-4682. I'll also show anyone the full email.
Warwick has more government than it can afford.
Time to make some cuts. Real Cuts.
Email from GOP Chairman Danny Hall referenced in this column:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: EileenGGrossman
To:
Sent: Fri, Sep 9, 2011 6:48 pm
Subject: A Message from Danny Hall, Warwick Republican City Chairperson
Our Mayor has done everything he can to make Warwick a better place to live, he’s always made himself available for us and has never hid behind any decisions he has made. Yet, we have Bob Cushman, Rob Cote and Richard Langseth, taking cheap shots at him whenever they can. I couldn’t imagine being a mayor and putting in the time and effort that Mayor Avedisian has; last I checked Bob Cushman was crushed in the 2008 elections in a very anti-Republican year. Richard Langseth couldn’t run a Del’s lemonade stand if giving the opportunity but yet he feels he can run the City of Warwick better. We as a committee and fellow Republicans can no longer stand on the side lines and watch our Mayor continue to take cheap shots. It’s about time we start pointing out ‘the facts’ and take some shots of our own. Please refer to: http://warwickonline.com/stories/Warwick-taxes-among-lowest-of-RI-cities,62485
Eileen
Eileen G. Grossman
RIGOP Volunteer Coordinator Victory 2012
1800 Post Road Suite 17-I
Warwick, RI 02886
401-732-8282
email: eileenggrossman@aol.com
Thank You Mr. Cushman
Thank you Bob, Rob and Richard for keeping the momentum going. You are not alone in what you stand for. Some might say things could be worse--we need to always remember that things can be BETTER. And I believe they will be.
Ah the irony of Chairman Hall calling for party loyalty toward someone who has none. Where was the call for loyalty when Mayor Avedisian was openly working against electing Republican John Robitaille for governor?
Phil Hirons, Jr.
Chair, Smithfield GOP
Former Warwick Republican
Hey Dan? Do you understand what you are doing? I don't think so. And you thought you could run for city council? You are nothing lapdog. Avedisian is all about himself and Danny you are stupid enoungh not to see it.
Mr. Cushman, I am Eileen Grossman, Volunteer Coordinator for the RIGOP and in keeping with my duties I will share appropriate Republican news sent to me by elected officials, city and town committee chairs and candidates. The document that you posted with my name was not created by me but was sent by me for sharing by Danny Hall. You had no right to use my format and make it appear as though I was the originator of this letter. I am hoping the Warwick Beacon readers will now question your credibility.
Danny what have you done? You owe Bob Cushman an apology? “Bob, we may have our differences and may not agree on every issue but I feel I owe you an apology. Let me know how I can help”. This guy has told and spun so many lies and his disrespect for the Mayor is boarder line fatal attraction boil the bunny sort of thing and you owe him an apology.....Seems you may be playing both sides of the fence.... very uncool! You have lost my support as Im sure many others.
The only thing I agree and support is your commet about the the Dels cart.
@ Eileen-Did you read it? And if you did you could not forward this type of email. Danny Hall should have been the one sending it. Last year I was in full support of Danny Hall but talking out of both sides of his mouth. I see your true colors shinin' through I see your true colors and that's why I won't vote for you.
I think certain people maybe reading into this story too much, I apologized to Bob over an issue I was wrong on. I'm sorry if people are trying to put a twist on this, as for running next year that is not on my mind and most likely wont happen. That email was mainly to stop in house fighting with the Republican party which there is a lot of. I have no problem with protest or free speech but when people are being harassed or followed that's when you cross the line. I'm pretty sure I placed my number up here, if you are truly upset with this your more than welcome to give me a call.
Hey Danny......you can't have it both ways.....you have blown any political future you might have had because you have everyone mad at you. You tried to play both sides and you couldn't do it.
Go back to Avedisian and see how he will stab you in the back like he has done to everyone else. I would recommend Danny you dig yourself a hole and don't come out.
Danny claims that his email was intended "to stop in house fighting with Republican Party." Fair enough, but it would be nice if I got an invitation to the Ward 6 Republican Committee meetings.
Richard, Mr. Hall's claim that he wrote the email "to stop in house fighting with the Republican party which there is a lot of", is nothing but spin.
If that was the casewhy, as I wrote in the column did he attack you in such a disparaging manner? Would someone who is trying to make peace proclaim to all Republicans state wide that you as a fellow Republican "couldn’t run a Del’s lemonade stand"? A reasonable person would conclude that Mr. Hall once again is having a difficult time telling the truth.
The fact of the matter is that his email did just what he said he was trying to stop. Mr. Phil Hirons, Jr. has a valid point in his comment concerning Mayor Avedisian supporting Lincoln Chafee over Republican John Robitaille for governor.
I think Mr. Hall needs to take a serious pause in his duties as Warwick GOP Chairman and consider whether he has what it takes to contunue to be involved in the political process.
As to Ms. Eileen Grossman claim that I, "had no right to use my format and make it appear as though I was the originator of this letter." That clearly is not an accurate statement. Please review the post of that comment. It it titled, "On 9/15/11 at 05:15 PM, Bob_Cushman wrote". That means I wrote the comment. It couldn't be any clearer to understand than that. Also, I specifically state in my column that Ms. Grossman sent the email as part of her duties and in the comment before the post I write, "Email from GOP Chairman Danny Hall referenced in this column". Finally, Chairman Hall thanked me for posting the comment containing his email about 2 hours later. So if he didn't have a problem why does anyone else?
Im not sure who is the biggest sleeze here..... Cushman for printing the email or Hall for playing both sides of the fence. Either way I dont support either one, neither one seems to be upstanding.
@Connor: The fact that I was specifically named in Mr. Hall email targeting me for all to "take some shots" at, gives me the right to expose this email. I would agree with you if this was a general message without no particular person singled out.
In addition it is you who is being a "sleeze" by commenting that I have " told and spun so many lies" without specifically backing up your claim. Why don't you list the facts you have that prove that I have lied? This is typical of many of the administration supporters in this city - the hiit and run approach without any substance.
It's easy to throw out alligations without any facts to support a claim. I have backed up the entire point of this column by exposing the factural email message Chairman Hall composed and distributed by Ms. Eileen Grossman. Mr. Hall didn't have a problem with me posting it, why do you?
For your next post why don't you use your real name? Don't have the courage?
I will be glad to hold a public debate any time, any where with you and Mr. Hall regarding the city budget and I will be prepared to show documentation supporting my position.
panties in a bunch
1. When a person overreacts to a trifling insult or barb, or to a joke.
2. When someone acts in an anal-retentive manner, and makes a big fuss out of a relatively minor problem.
1. Don't get you're panties all in a bunch, he doesn't mean it.
2. It's not that big of a problem, don't get your panties all in a bunch, it's going to be okay
panties in a bunch
when a party or subject begins to act in an anally retensive manner; someone that try to front when they styles ain't fly.
Damn, why you gotta be gettin' your panties in a bunch?
A quote from Eileen G. Grossman,
" he’s ( Mayor Avedisian ) always made himself available for us and has never hid behind any decisions he has made. Yet, we have Bob Cushman, Rob Cote and Richard Langseth, taking cheap shots at him.
I was at City Hall last night.
The Mayor did everything to NOT be availible to anyone in the room.
The 'hearing' was purposely set up by his 'blockers' as a 'monologue' where a ' dialogue ' was clearly intentioned by the people that requested his appearance..
The Mayor had the option to answer questions if he wanted to but 'chose' to stick by the verbage.
He should have a 'D" next to his name.
I challenge you to ask the Mayor to have a town hall meeting where he " Makes himself availible "
Show us his conservativism. It simply will not happen.
He cannot face the conservatives in this town.
The only people that interest him are other rinos.
Cut and paste the next line into your browser for WPRI on the Mayor's 'walk out'
http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/local_news/west_bay/warwick-mayor-snubs-car-tax-protestors?ref=scroller&categoryId=20000&status=true
I was especially grossed out by the four to four "tie" on the vote to open the meeting to questions and answers. Rhode Island courts have ruled that tie votes to to the moving party, in this case, Councilman Solomon. Yet, Warwick City Council President, Bruce Place, ruled the opposite declaring a failed motion.
This is the kind of behavior that must stop. Chairman should have changed his vote to "Yes" if he has to follow some weird local rule on tied votes. That would have shown that he has enough courage to run the meeting, meet the rulings by the Rhode Island courts, and actually found out -- on the record -- that the mayor lied about the rental car agencies registering their cars in Warwick.
Our new councilperson from Ward 3 cast a shocking "No" vote after running on a platform of openness and responsiveness to the people of Warwick. She will not be able to ever use that line again.