Same name but worlds apart in wages

Lookout

John Hazen-White Jr.
Posted 2/6/14

Sometimes life is so ironic, you can’t make these things up. The name of my company, Taco (an acronym for the Thermal Appliance Company, our original name from the 1920s when my grandfather started …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Same name but worlds apart in wages

Lookout

Posted

Sometimes life is so ironic, you can’t make these things up. The name of my company, Taco (an acronym for the Thermal Appliance Company, our original name from the 1920s when my grandfather started the company), is often mispronounced, even here in Rhode Island. Instead of “Tay-co,” people say “Ta-co,” like the tortilla sandwich. It’s an innocent enough mispronunciation, and one that has prompted the creation of this corrective phrase: “Tacos are for eating … Taco is for heating.”

Now here’s the irony. Several months ago a new building on Cranston Street, a block north of our building, began to go up. Once the shell was up, it was obvious that this was going to be a retail outlet and, with a drive-through window, one serving food. Finally came the signage and, lo and behold, what was it – none other than a Taco Bell. No sooner was that revealed then the phones at Taco began to ring about hiring at the Taco Bell.

Taco and Taco Bell; just a block apart, but a world apart in terms of wages and benefits paid to employees. Of course, that’s the difference between working in today’s advanced manufacturing as opposed to the fast food service industry. Taco Bell pays its employees at hourly wage minimums and provides few, if any, benefits below the managerial level. Certainly many of the hard working people who work there would prefer to work for a business providing good wages and benefits. In manufacturing, for example, workers make far beyond the minimum wage. I don’t think anyone has ever been paid at the minimum wage level at Taco since the minimum wage standard was established in 1938 at 25 cents an hour.

There’s a battle brewing across the country right now about the minimum wage and low paying jobs provided by some major companies. Wal-Mart, which has been challenged over its employee policies for years, has been running ads showing presumably real Wal-Mart associates, instead of actors, saying how great the company is to them. One of Taco Bell’s competitors, McDonald’s, has tripped over itself by advising its workers on how to scrimp and save to get by on the wages it pays. We’ve also learned that many minimum wage workers have to rely on government and community assistance to make ends meet. Companies that pay low wages have a responsibility not to force their employees to seek public aid to get by. In contrast, I don’t see protesters on the news carrying signs about low wages in American factories.

With the economy still under-performing and jobs hard to come by, a number of states have raised their minimum wage levels beyond the federal level of $7.25 an hour. Both Rhode and Massachusetts’ levels are at $8 currently. Rhode Island legislators may choose to push the Ocean State’s level to $9 starting next year. President Obama again called for a federal level of $10 in his State of the Union speech, which the do-nothing Congress failed to act on last year.

Business owners’ attitude toward raising the minimum wage is usually negative and always predicts negative consequences for workers, which seldom materialize because, after all, it’s hard to run a business without people. But with workers in the streets protesting and stories surfacing of minimum wage workers on food stamps, attitudes are changing. Even a significant number of Republican voters now support raising the minimum wage.

All honest work, whatever its nature and at whatever level, is ennobling and serves a positive and needed function in any economy. Most people really do want to work and earn wages to pay for a living. All workers deserve a living wage so they can provide for their families and save for the future.

Those at the bottom ladder of the wage scale deserve a raise. But to better secure not only a living wage, but a good paying job requires education and training in today’s economy. We owe these things to all of our children. Not everyone needs a college education to do well in life either, but every worker needs the chance to train to advance. Most of the folks who labor at dead-end service sector jobs are stuck there because of a lack of training and education.

Hourly wage workers have nowhere else to go but up and our society needs to help them make that climb. Educational opportunities are a must, but then it takes individual self-motivation and perseverance to make the difference in one’s working life.

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • JohnStark

    We already pay a higher percent of GDP on "training and education" than any other developed country.

    "Companies that pay low wages have a responsibility not to force their employees to seek public aid to get by." There's a lot here, but lets start with a company's 'responsibilities'. A company is responsible to provide a safe working environment and pay a wage that is mutually agreed to with workers without coercion. That's it. The latest fads of a "livable wage", "income inequality" and various other class envy-driven phrases are pure farce. Workers are paid precisely what they are worth to their employer. If they are unhappy, they are free to apply their skills with an employer who will pay them a more competitive wage. It is no business of President Obama's, or any other beaurocrats, what a willing employer and willing employee negotiate as a fair wage.

    Tuesday, February 11, 2014 Report this