While former school superintendent Peter Horoschak was placed on administrative leave in September and continued to get paid until an agreement ending employment was announced on Dec. 22, the School …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
While former school superintendent Peter Horoschak was placed on administrative leave in September and continued to get paid until an agreement ending employment was announced on Dec. 22, the School Committee has yet to take action to permanently fill the post.
That could change at the School Committee meeting Tuesday.
Committee member Jennifer Ahearn, who questioned whether the committee should name a search panel last month and was told by the department’s human services director and legal counsel Rosemary Healey that her inquiry was inappropriate, wants to see a nationwide search for Horoshak’s successor. Special education director Richard D’Agostino has been serving in the role of acting superintendent since Horoschak left.
“I asked that it be put on the agenda,” Ahearn said Tuesday.
She said she would like to have the department retain an outside consultant who would assess department needs, conduct interviews and come to the School Committee with a short list of candidates. She feels that much is owed to the city and to the children.
She said it is the committee’s job to “strive for the best education for our children” and if that approach isn’t taken, “we’re falling way short of where we should be.”
Healey said Tuesday that she is waiting for the committee to determine a course of action. Among the options she listed were a national or local search and for the committee to name a superintendent without conducting a search.
Horoschak’s three-year contract expired this August. A severance payment was not disclosed. The Beacon has filed a request under the Open Records Act for access to those parts of the agreement that fall under the law.
Since taking on the role of acting superintendent, D’Agostino has reactivated the school facilities planning committee, dividing it into subcommittees studying short- and long-term goals as the system experiences a decline in enrollment. The short-term panel is in the midst of studying the closure of either Aldrich or Gorton Junior High, as the two schools and Winman Junior High are operating at less than half capacity.
Meeting prior to the School Committee, the short-term subcommittee is expected to review projected savings if one or the other school was closed. The subcommittee will make a recommendation to the School Committee, which will conduct at least one public hearing before taking action according to D’Agostino.
School Committee Chair Bethany Furtado could not be reached for comment.
4 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
Justanidiot
Why all the transparency?
Just secretly hire someone to be the superintendent, give the a quarter of a million dollars to carry out a secret agenda, and if they don't toe the line, cast them adrift, with a hefty severance package.
Nobody has to know who it is, what they are doing, and why they left. Keep it all on the q.t. Especially the taxpayers. Why should they know what they are spending money on.
Thursday, February 7, 2013 Report this
resident123
Its nice to see a pro-active school committee member!
Thursday, February 7, 2013 Report this
awferns
Warwick public Schools are in need of a strong leader. Jen Ahearn recognizes the importance of this issue and I urge all of the school committee members to "strive for the best education for our children"!
Monday, February 11, 2013 Report this
dweedon
Good to know that we have a School Committee member (Ahearn) advocating for a search for the open top job at Warwick Public Schools which was abruptly vacated this fall. So if it's inappropriate for her to ask at an open School Committee meeting if the search for the new superintendent position can be put on the agenda, what exactly is appropriate to address the vacancy? Nothing? Don't the parents and the taxpayers have the right to know that the school district is following a sensible course of action to fill this position? It may be that D'Agostino or another Warwick administrator ends up being offered the position after a search, but what is wrong with having a search? Shouldn't that be required by law?
Monday, February 11, 2013 Report this