Schools OK budget, now it's up to mayor, council

By Tessa Roy
Posted 4/18/17

By TESSA ROY The School Committee approved Superintendent Philip Thornton's $167 million budget as is on Wednesday, but it's still unclear how it will fare when the spending package reaches the mayor's desk and followed by the City Council. On Friday,

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Schools OK budget, now it's up to mayor, council

Posted

The School Committee approved Superintendent Philip Thornton’s $167 million budget as is on Wednesday, but it’s still unclear how it will fare when the spending package reaches the mayor’s desk and followed by the City Council.

On Friday, Finance Committee Chair Ed Ladouceur hadn’t made up his mind on whether he is open to giving the schools the additional $4.8 million in funding requested. He wants to see Mayor Scott Avedisian’s budget and plans for the schools before he and the council make any decisions.

“Let’s wait until we see what the mayor’s doing,” he said. “Once the mayor gets his proposed budget to us, I’ll do my due diligence as finance chair.”

The school’s budget will request 4 percent more, a jump to $124 million in taxpayer funding as opposed to the previous year’s $119 million, in funding from the city. It will first be sent to Avedisian, who will put his budget before the council next month. The mayor previously said that he’d spoken with Thornton and School Committee Chair Beth Furtado to discuss what the increases would fund and the “pros and cons of budgeting with a contract resolution and without a contract resolution.”

The only “nay” vote on the school budget came from School Committee Member Karen Bachus, who said she dissented because she wanted more funding go to classrooms. On Wednesday, she didn’t express much faith in its chances.

“The City Council always disappoints us, so this is almost an exercise in frustration,” she had said. On Friday, she added, “I will be very surprised given the history since they cut us 5 percent back in 09-07. However, miracles do happen!”

After the budget was approved Wednesday, Furtado said committee members have “asked what they’ve asked” and all that’s left to do is wait.

“I believe [the budget] is not asking too much – $4.2 million of the $4.5 million are increased costs that we cannot afford and that we should not afford,” she said. “I know that this is going to come back to us after the appropriations from the city and we’ll have to make cuts that I fear that none of us are going to want to make.”

As it stands now, salary costs laid out in the budget are projected to increase by a net of $1,858,971 from last year. Set aside is $2,350,940 for the possibility of teacher raises pending a contract settlement. No staff reductions are planned, but the budget says there may be a need to re-purpose certain positions to meet student needs. However, the additional need of about $4 million in funding could lead to a need to reduce staff or programs if those funds are unavailable, it notes.

The budget also designates $511,300 for additional Chromebooks and $630,800 for Modern Classrooms and standardizing instructional technology equipment, including smart TVs, document cameras and promethium educational devices to be installed in the high schools. School Technology Director Doug Alexander had previously said during a separate presentation of the budget that between 140 and 150 promethean boards, about 75 per school, would be installed in the high schools.

Additionally, approximately $39 million for the schools would come from the state budget. That aid will be determined in June pending General Assembly approval of the governor’s budget.

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • richardcorrente

    The problem is NOT the needs of the students, the teachers, or the buildings. We can appreciate those needs. These are clear needs that have to be addressed. The problem lies in the organization that is handling the funds for all of that. They have proven themselves to be wholly untrustworthy time after time. Remember the Ragosta Report? Remember the Mario Atoyan tragedy; or the David LaPlante tragedy. The charter says that no one (not the City Council; not the Mayor; NO ONE!) can suggest of advise the School Committee (SC) "once they have the money".

    The solution is simple. Don't give them a dime UNTIL WE HAVE AN AUDIT! An independent audit from an outside source will go a long way toward restoring faith in the SC that everyone, except certain members of the SC believes that we need desperately.

    They are submitting an increased budget for a decreased student population. I can't support it. You shouldn't either. The City Council shouldn't. The mayor shouldn't. I hope they all don't until there is SOME sort of accountability. If the City Council and the Warwick taxpayers agree to give the SC the additional $85,000,000 they recently asked for, added to the $160,000,000 they already have (with NO accountability), then our cost of educating our (less than) 9,000 students comes to over $27,000 per student. As a comparison, I called the Beverly Hills School Department. Their cost is $14,333 per student. Should the Warwick taxpayers pay almost double what the Beverly Hills taxpayers pay?

    Happy summer everyone.

    Rick Corrente

    The Taxpayers Mayor

    Wednesday, April 19, 2017 Report this