Schools plan for cell phone ban

Posted

With the first day of school rapidly approaching for Warwick’s students, school officials are emphasizing that electronic devices, primarily cell phones, will not be given a warm welcome back once class is back in session.

“It's a good time, as school is about to be back in session, to emphasize to parents and the community that we're serious about eliminating cell phones as a distraction to the school day,” said Bob Littlefield, director of secondary education for Warwick schools, during a special meeting of the School Committee on Thursday.

Approved in April, the school committee unanimously passed a policy restricting the use of any personal electronic device – including cell phones, smartphones, smart watches, etc. – “during school hours,” which is purposefully broad to include situations not solely happening in the classroom.

Only in specifically directed scenarios where a teacher grants permission for an educational purpose can personal electronics be used during school hours, and students who are caught on such devices may face consequences up to a confiscation of the device.

However, the exact scale of consequences that would occur from a violation of this policy has not been drawn up at this time. There was discussion regarding the issue at Thursday’s meeting, but a finalized set of marching orders will need to be communicated to parents and teachers prior to the school year kicking into gear.

“We can't confiscate or provide disciplinary action to a single student until the consequences are laid out,” said school committee member David Testa.

Littlefield said that discussions were well underway and ongoing regarding the scale of discipline with the secondary school principals. He explained a basic framework of the policy’s disciplinary protocols had been discussed.

“It's progressive discipline,” he said. “This is a topic for our discussion when we meet in our secondary principals meeting prior to school opening. Consequences range from confiscation of the device, assignment of detention and assignment of Friday detentions, which is a practice they follow at the high schools, then confiscation of device for it to be returned only to the parent in the event of multiple offenses.”

Committee chairwoman Karen Bachus has been a vocal supporter of the policy since it was originally brought up earlier in the year, and emphasized the importance of all schools in the district enforcing the policy in an equitable way.

“Going forward this is a policy that the school committee takes very seriously,” she said. “We take our students’ education very seriously. We expect it to be administered in a firm, fair and consistent manner. And if we find out that it is not being administered in a firm, fair and consistent manner to all students, then we might have problems. But I know we have great administration and faculty and I know that everybody is going to work for what is best for the kids.”

Parents can expect more information as school comes closer to resuming for the 2019/20 school year, and students will be receiving information during their orientation sessions regarding the new, stricter policy as well. It is a policy that will almost certainly surely generate disagreements between the student body and those in charge of their education, although those in charge of enacting the policy were unified in their adopting of it.

“I'm very much in favor of this, although I have an incoming senior who begs to disagree with me,” said Testa.

Comments

6 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
wwkvoter

Finally.

Thursday, August 15
RISchadenfreude

Thank you...and stop asking anyone under 18 for their opinion on the subject.

Friday, August 16
scot63

I will instruct my kids NOT TO GIVE UP THEIR CELLPHONES!!!! I will also advise them to use only for emergency!!!!

Tuesday, August 20
Cat

God forbid we have a lock down and then this entire policy will go out the window. If I were still a student, I would keep my phone with me. I will take the punishment because I refuse to be without communication in case someone tries to gun me down. Just try to pry it out of my hands. I really hope and pray this is never put to the test in Warwick schools.You have a bunch of teachers that couldn't be bothered to upload the emergency software on their phones last year just because the superintendent asked them to and now you want to tell me the same teachers are going to be the only ones with phones in case of an emergency? I wouldn't feel safe at all.

Folks, this isn't 1980 anymore. What you did in school isn't what your kid does in school. The dangers your child faces EVERY SINGLE DAY WALKING INTO THE SCHOOL are not what you faced walking into your school. That phone is a life line and you want to remove it from the classroom just because a few students are abusing the current policy. Good luck.

oh, and "we expect it to be administered in a firm, fair and consistent manner." is absolutely laughable. Teachers always have and always will have favorites. There will be kids that get punished and kids that skate by. Good luck with that as well.

Tuesday, August 20
Dad

How short sighted in this day and age can the Warwick administration be? My child will have their cell phone on them at all times while in school. Can they be punished for using it during class, yes. Can they be punished for having it be a distraction to themselves or others, yes. But can you take it away from them, hell no. Last year the public schools around the nation and even right here in Rhode Island showed that they are not able to keep children safe in a school setting. Taking away their only personal communication device is so wrong minded as to be ground for dismissal and revocation of any outstanding contract for any employees or board members to recommend such.

Wednesday, August 21
perky

no one under the age of 18 should have a cell phone

Thursday, August 22