Community
Advertise with us
Today's top ads | Jobs | Cars | Homes | Yellow pages | Videos
32 firefighters in $100,000 club
by Russell J. Moore
Jan 21, 2010 | 1937 views | 69 69 comments | 35 35 recommendations | email to a friend | print
When Mayor Scott Avedisian sits down to garner concessions from the Warwick Firefighter’s union, he’ll be negotiating with a bargaining unit that has 32 members who were paid more than him last year.

Avedisian, Warwick’s chief executive officer, is paid $100,000 per year.

The Beacon recently requested a list from the City Treasurer of the number of firefighters in Warwick earning $100,000 or more, and a brief description of how those firefighters are paid.

There are 217 firefighter positions in the city, with 200 of those positions filled. That means 32 members of the 200-member fire department make a total of $3.5 million before factoring in benefits like pension or health care insurance.

The list is comprised exclusively of the Fire Department’s ranking officers, including the Chief, Assistant Chief, Fire Marshal, Superintendent of Fire Alarms, Rescue Captain, EMS Coordinator, Battalion Chiefs, Captains, and Lieutenants. There were no privates on the list.

Those numbers represent last year’s calendar year – a year in which the fire department union agreed to take pay cuts ranging from 3-5 percent over the last 4 months of the year in order for the city to balance a difficult budget due to cutbacks in state aid to municipalities.

A firefighter’s total compensation package is made up of several factors that include: base pay, overtime, step increases, clothing allowances, unused sick time, firefighters filling in for superiors and therefore working above rank, holiday pay, and working details (which is, in fact, paid for the most part by private companies).

The compensation packages for those 32 firefighters represent only the money they were paid last year and does not take into account the health insurance and pension benefits the city also spent for fire protection services.

In sum, Warwick’s 32 highest paid firefighters were paid roughly $2.4 million in base salary.

Those same 32 firefighters were collectively paid about $550,935 in overtime costs. Of that group of 32, 14 were paid more than $20,000 in 2009 in overtime costs.

Fire Department Captain Peter F. Sisson was paid $33,521.58 in overtime last year. Capt. Sisson earned the most money in overtime amongst the department’s 32 highest paid firefighters.

All things considered, Sisson earned $120,141.41 in 2009.

Firefighters normally work two 10-hour day shifts per week, and two 14-hour night shifts per week. Anything extra goes to overtime.

Fire Department Chief Kevin Sullivan does not work any overtime, but earned $127,596.90 – the most money in the Fire Department last year.

In addition to base pay, firefighters are also paid step increases, formerly known as longevity. Longevity is paid to firefighters as de facto raises for their years of service. That group of firefighters was paid almost $330,000 in sum for achieving step increases last year.

Firefighters are also paid a yearly “clothing allowance.” In sum, that same group of firefighters was paid 9,600 in clothing allowances.

When firefighters agreed to concessions last year, they consented to the 3-5 percent pay cut, but never agreed to have that reduced rate apply to overtime. Instead, the union was paid their normal rate for overtime, forcing the finance department to create a separate line item to account for those costs. For Warwick’s 32 highest paid firefighters, those costs accounted for $6,061.

That group of firefighters was also paid $24,733 collectively under the “on the job injury” line item.

Under Warwick’s contract with firefighters, the firefighters are paid for not using their allotted sick time. That line item totaled $72,809 for Warwick’s 32 highest paid firefighters.

When a fire department management official is absent from the job due to illness or for any other reason, one of the lower ranking firefighters often has to cover that person’s responsibilities. That practice is commonly referred to as “working out of class.” Warwick’s firefighters who made more than $100,000 last year were paid a collective $3,159 for working out of class.

Given the nature of a Fire Department, firefighters are often forced to work on holidays. According to their contract with the city, whether or not they’re forced to work on those holidays, each firefighter is paid 14 days pay for holidays, whether they worked them or not. The holiday pay earned by the collective group of Warwick’s 32 highest paid firefighters totaled $83,865.

Lastly, firefighters are often needed to perform detail work for large events. Those costs, encumbered usually by the private sector business owners, netted Warwick’s 32 highest paid firefighters $11,952.

A recent compiled by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council (RIPEC) revealed that on a statewide basis, taxpayers in Rhode Island spend the most on fire protection services in the country.

On average, the report showed that Rhode Islanders spend about $6.24 on fire services for every $1,000 of personal income, or just under double the national average of $3.21 per $1,000 of income.

Put another way, on average, every Rhode Islander spends about $233 per year to pay for fire protection.

The study, released in the fall of last year, used information from the year 2007, the last year that nation-wide data was available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Public sector union leaders have taken issue with the report, but RIPEC’s Suzanne Greschner said she and RIPEC stand completely behind the numbers.

A survey by Harris Interactive conducted in 2007 found that based on public opinion, firefighters have the most prestigious job in America.

Calls placed to Marcel Fontenault, President of Local 2748 were not returned by press time.

City Personnel Director Oscar Shelton, one of the leaders of the negotiations on behalf of the taxpayers with the public sector unions, said that its difficult to gain concessions with a union that can always resort to binding arbitration to protect the benefits it already has.

“It’s difficult to deal with an organization that can go to arbitration and overrule anything that we do,” said Shelton.

Shelton said that the firefighters who earned the most money did so for a reason.

“They do put the time in,” said Shelton.

Council President Bruce Place (Ward-2) was surprised by those costs.

“I don’t think anybody except for the top echelon in the Fire Department should make that,” said Place.

Place also said he’d like to see the overtime costs reduced.

“The big concern on the part of the council is the amount of overtime paid to firefighters over the years,” said Place.

Place also said that at city council hearings last spring, the council was told that new recruits would be brought in to cut down on overtime, yet from what he understands, that hasn’t happened.

“Here we are in mid-January, and as of last week there was no class of new recruits that had begun, and so the overtime is piling up,” said Place.

City Councilman Steve Merolla, (Ward-9) said that the City can’t afford to be paying those types of wages to so many firefighters.

“What are our priorities? You can’t be paying people this amount of overtime, sick time, etc. while you’re closing four schools, while people’s homes are getting foreclosed on, and the unemployment rate is almost 13-percent,” said Merolla.

“The department of public works doesn’t have overtime like this. City Hall employees don’t have overtime like this. And the school department doesn’t have overtime like this.”

In an email yesterday, Avedisian pointed out that it might seem like an easy fix by hiring people in order to reduce overtime, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the city will save money.

“You can always look to reduce expenses but you would need to analyze how much is attributed to overtime and whether or not hiring people instead of paying overtime is cost effective,” said Avedisian.

Hiring new firefighters would cut down on overtime, but the city would have to pay new firefighters health care and pension benefits.

comments (69)
« nobody made you work wrote on Sunday, May 23 at 06:22 PM »
Wa wa, you have to work weekends. Big deal.
« thetruth888 wrote on Friday, Mar 12 at 09:56 AM »
i have an idea, next time you have a medical emergency dont call us, call med tech or new england ambulance. lol have fun. i know guys that have worked for these places for 3 years and have not started ONE iv. they dont have 911 experience. alot of places that have seperate ems heres what happens, say you call for shoulder pain, they send a BLS rescue to your house, now what happnes if thhey get there and determine your shoulder pain is a result of a possible MI because now your chest hurts, they have to call for ALS back, all in your sitting there for 20 mins while your basically having a heart attack. you call 911 you have pretty much a mobile emergency room at your door in 3 minutes. as for the 10 fires a year guy, 10 fires huh?? yea the ones that make the news, it doesnt have to be a fully involved 2 alarm fire to be a fire, moron. as for the clothing guy, i didnt realize carptenters and painters get blood and bodily fliud on their clothes from people with communicable diseases. we have an airport, now a train station, 39 miles of ocean line, and a massive stretch of 95 north/south. 37 est/west and the connector. you cant imagine how many accidents we respond to. but of course on the ones where people die are on the news so you would never now. ill pay 25 percent to my health like you people in private industry, but then i also want yearly bonuses and no weekends and holidays. UNDERSTAND.
« get a clue wrote on Friday, Jan 29 at 01:57 PM »
another fool shouting privatize. again if you can read do some research, there are NO private fire departments in the ENTIRE country!! why?? because it never has been and NEVER will be PROFITABLE!!!! so get a clue!!!

by the way, im sure the family on west shore road dont think warwick firefighers are overpaid!! everyone has a beef until its their family on the line.
« look at big numbers wrote on Wednesday, Jan 27 at 02:35 PM »
what a bogus number. I read somewhere, where a firefighter who retires around 50 will cost tax payers about $2 million in retirement costs.

so that means at some point in time the 200 on duty now will cost us more then $400 million dollars.

let's say taxpayers must riase that money over 30 years, that means we would need about 13.3 million a year, divided by 365 day = $36,529 a day divided by 85,000 residents = about 43 cents a day.

my point, it will soon cost more per day to pay for the unsustainable pensions and healthcare benefits then the cost to the firfighters on duty doing work.

when you break it down per person any line item in the budget will look small and reasonable. that's not how you budget.

put the figures together and you come up with the 7 digit numbers that are bankrupting the city.

This goes for teachers too.

« 64 cents wrote on Wednesday, Jan 27 at 09:59 AM »
I am absolutely astounded about the number of misinformed readers who are complaining about the superior service they receive from the Warwick Fire Dept. for 64 cents per day! Before I moved to Warwick, I lived in a town protected by a volunteer fire department-you never knew if and when they were going to show up, and when they finally did show up, they were totally clueless. I know firsthand, as they mis-diagnosed my father's stroke, which resulted in delayed treatment and a worsening of his condition. I have had the opportunity to utilize the services of the Warwick Fire Dept. on two ocassions since moving to the city, and both times their service was prompt, professional, and caring. As a taxpayer in the city, I will gladly pay 64 cents per day for the first rate services I receive from the fire department. The citizens of this city should be proud of this outstanding group of individuals.
« the solution wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 10:13 PM »


PRIVATIZE
« the bright side wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 06:44 PM »
We may struggle with high taxes, and what we pay for our local services, but at least it wasn't a Warwick firefighter (he was from Boston) that was out on dissability, while competing in a body building competition.
« Wondering ??? wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 05:59 PM »
The firefighters who worked 60 hrs a week last year...how much was spent sleeping at the firehouse.

Did they include all the time shopping at Dave's Market?
« Blame wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 01:50 PM »
Whoever and wherever you are in life is the choices you made, you have nobody to blame but yourselves.

Whatever job you tried for, went to school for is your choice.

The firefighters chose there careers because of various reasons as you chose yours.

Why are you jumping on anyone?

If you don't like where your at in life...CHANGE IT !

« Lets not forget wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 01:47 PM »
That with that crazy schedule they all work second jobs that pay another 20-50k a year...hahaha...you jealous ******

Imagine working 2 jobs ?

The lifestyle they must lead always working to provide.
« other peoples money wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 12:20 PM »
Solved here? This just gives me something to do between cashing my welfare checks
« Grandstanding wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 11:57 AM »
What is really solved here???

I just wasted 10 minutes of my day reading all the comments, some are interesting ,others are just misinformed or just don't truly care.

They are venting which is expected but what do they do for a career.post your earnings and perks on here and see if private industry compares to professionals...start typing
« other peoples money wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 10:49 AM »
Chris EK, I'm thrilled to hear to the wonderful story about your husband. And I too believe that we have a wonderful fire department.But, If it hadn't been a false alarm the CO would have dissipated out the open doors and windows. the WFD could have gotten hear even sooner had they just hopped into a WFD car and drove over. Don't think that gov't. protocals are always well thought out. Do you think these wonderful men are braver than the grunts that fight and die everyday for our freedom. Using your logic our military men and women should all make a million dollars a year. And I also think that it would be wonderful to have a station on every block with police on every corner. But its not practical. I grew up with a volunteer FD in my town. The dept. wasn't as good as a full time proffesional FD, but it was what the resources of my community could afford. Tough choices have to made. Godspeed.
« do the math wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 10:41 AM »
The ignorance of some of these posters never ceases to amaze me. The firefighters that made over $100,000 worked an average of 60 HOURS PER WEEK, EVERY WEEK OF LAST YEAR! I don't know about you, but if I put in that amount of hours at my job, I would expect to be paid over $200,000, and at my job I don't work nights, weekends, or holidays! All this complaining about the firefighters for 64 cents per day?-Get a life you losers.
« Danny Hall Ward 5 wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 09:44 AM »
You maybe right but the Voters will still vote him in.

Danny Hall Independent Canidate Ward 5
« Who ? wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 07:23 AM »
Who are all these people that participated in all these bonanzas the unions refer to?

Maybe it took place in other states but not RI.

The facts are the middle class nonunion employee has seen their standard of living DECREASE over the last ten years while the unions have seen an increase in their benefits.

Warwick fire dept, e.g. lifetime healthcare for husband and wife, $600 cap on prescriptions, increase from 70 % to 75% of salary at retirement, continued 3% COLA increases in pension every year....the list could go on and on.

Mayor Avedesian has given away the store.
« Blue from Warwick wrote on Monday, Jan 25 at 11:17 PM »
You "private sector" and unemployed people are now salivating over these public jobs that you had no interest in when economy was good. Now that your real estate bonanza, contruction bonanza, mortgage bonanza and tech bonanza have all dried up you want to start bashing public employees ten fold. The private sector was nice for quite a while, you remember, back when you had pity for public employees who then didn't make anything like you were making. But now it's an issue! YOU COULD HAVE BEEN PAYING PUBLIC EMPLOYEES MINIMUM WAGE WITH NO BENEFITS FOR THE PAST TEN YEARS AND COMMUNITIES WOULD STILL BE IN THE SAME SITUATION AS THEY ARE NOW. THEY WOULD HAVE SPEND WHAT THEY HAD, RUN DEFECITS ETC.. YOU ALL THINK IF IT WASN'T FOR THE DARN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ALL THE COMMUNITIES WOULD BE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS IN THE BLACK. BULL!
« Danny Hall Ward 5 wrote on Monday, Jan 25 at 11:03 PM »
I've been to meetings, No matter how much you voice your concern the council will rule on what they want. I'm just a resident who is tired of nothing being done. We have a Council who is to busy fighting with eachother instead of working together to find solutions. I agree cuts need to be made but should be made across the board. One time cuts help immediately but do not save money in subsequent years like cuts in continuing expenses do. Merging departments ( animal control, library ect...
« who is danny hall? wrote on Monday, Jan 25 at 08:54 PM »
Daniel Hall, never heard of you. Why don't you explain what the "whole picture" is. What are the isuues right now in the city? Where have you been for the past years. When is the last time you attended a city council meeting and voiced your concerns?

I agree with you on council healthcare, but lets not just dismiss the issues associated with union legacy cost, including lifetime heathcare and pension issues.
« Danny Hall Ward 5 wrote on Monday, Jan 25 at 07:12 PM »
Hiring new firefighters would cut down on overtime, but the city would have to pay new firefighters health care and pension benefits. I think as a city we need to look at the whole picture, it's very easy to look at unions and say let's cut here but we need to look at everything. Not just the Police FIre or Teachers, when times are tough we must come together as a city and not point fingers. It seems to me that our City Council is very friendly to these unions during election time, also they voted for the contracts. We have Elected officials that work part time but yet get free health coverage, What's wrong with this picture?

Daniel Hall Independent Canidate Ward 5

MrHall82@verizon.net

 
 
 
event calendar Icon_info

Thursday, 02, 2010
post a new event Icon_info

Warwick Veteran's Memo... 7:00 AM
The Warwick Veteran's Memorial High School...
EAST GREENWICH ART CLU... 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM
EAST GREENWICH ART CLUB P.O.Box 1608, East...
URI Feinstein Providen... 9:00 AM
URI Feinstein Providence Campus Urban Arts...
Warwick Mall Reopens
Warwick Mall Reopens
MORE Video Here