Report Inappropriate Comments

The entire post on Facebook was a witch hunt. Warwick Watch didn't start out naming names, but told everyone there was only one transgender teen at Pilgrim. People put two and two together rather quickly. Warwick Watch outed and possibly endangered a minor to further a political agenda. When people came to this child's defense they were either deleted or harassed. Warwick Watch at one point last night was arguing with one of Ashlynn's classmates. The teen was respectful and very well spoken and Warwick Watch decided taunting her and telling her it was past her bedtime would be an appropriate argument. Warwick Watch keeps arguing that this will lead to a "free for all". What free for all exactly? At this point there is one transgender student using the appropriate facilities she identifies with and doing so with more modesty than many others. Warwick Watch continually berated and harassed this poor kid, crossing many lines as far as asking personal questions no stranger has a right to ask anyone nevermind a 15 year old. Warwick Watch later came up with a solution to allow LGBT students to be "properly vetted" and allow the school to demand a "clinical history". Why would a LGBT student have to go through a more rigorous screening process than another student to attend a public school?

From: Social media incites debate over transgender bathroom use

Please explain the inappropriate content below.