By PEDER S. SACHAEFER The Rhode Island Department of Health has concerns about the rollout of fifth-generation, or 5G, wireless service, with a spokesperson saying that not enough information on the safety of 5G wavelengths is available, even as telecom
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
The Rhode Island Department of Health has concerns about the rollout of fifth-generation, or 5G, wireless service, with a spokesperson saying that not enough information on the safety of 5G wavelengths is available, even as telecom providers continue to install new transmitters.
Joseph Wendelken, public information officer with RIDOH, said in an email this week that 5G is a complicated issue. There is some evidence that the longer frequency radio waves used by 2G and 3G networks cause cancer and disrupt certain nervous system processes However, whether [5G] are better or worse than other wavelengths remains to be seen. It is concerning to us because we dont have this information yet and 5G is rolling out quickly.
5G broadband networks are meant to increase internet upload and download speeds by more than 100 times over existing 4G technology, according to a press release from the office of Gov. Gina Raimondo. Better connectivity would pave the way for a future in which almost all devices, from appliances and phones to the electric grid and cars, are connected in the Internet of Things.
Rhode Island is one of the first states in the country to receive 5G service as part of a program by Verizon. Small cells, costing about $150, which emit 5G signals, were installed on the top of telephone poles in select locations in Providence and Pawtucket last summer.
But even as Verizon continues to expand 5G service throughout Rhode Island, concerns about the safety of the technology linger.
A person can escape a virus with lifestyle by deciding to go indoors, but I, in my house, cannot escape radiation, said Claire Stadmueller, a freelance opera singer living in Cranston who has been trying to bring the possible health dangers of 5G to the attention of city officials. I would not have the capability to turn off a 5G pole outside of my house, so 5G radiation would be imposed on me 24/7. From everything Ive read, this would compromise my health.
Stadmueller said she was worried not enough studies have been done about the safety of 5G. She said 5G could impact the human immune system, cause cancer, and hurt pollinators, such as bees.
Theyre doing this for economic reasons, to bolster the economic standing of the state, said Sheila Resseger, a Cranston resident for 39 years and a former teacher at the Rhode Island School for the Deaf. But, from what Im learning from all these scientists, there will be harm. There will be harm to people, to wildlife, to trees, and there will be lawsuits in the future from this harm. So who is going to be held accountable and who is going to pay for it?
Cranston Councilman Steve Stycos, who has received five emails from constituents with concerns said, "I'm upset that the city's ability to regulate this has been apparently removed and taken away from us. There doesn't seem to be any power of the city to look into the health effects and make a decision."
Verizon said they are continuing to roll out 5G service in Rhode Island.
David Weissmann, a public relations manager with Verizon, said via email that more information is available on wirelesshealthfacts.org, a website hosted by CTIA, a trade organization representing U.S. wireless communications companies. The website says 5G is safe, and that health concerns are unfounded.
The World Health Organization said that few studies have been done so far on the safety of 5G frequencies, but that no other frequency of wireless signals is found to be dangerous for humans. The WHO is researching the frequencies used by 5G, and plans to have a study out by 2022.
The RI DOH refuted claims that there is any connection between the spread of Covid-19 and 5G.
Tom Kogut, spokesman for the RI Division of Public Utilities and Carriers, said that the division was fielding calls from Rhode Islanders concerned about the safety of 5G, but that the regulatory body with power over wireless signals is the Federal Communications Commission in Washington D.C.
If these are small cell devices, these are devices that have been approved by standards approved by the FCC, said Kogut.
He said municipalities had some control over 5G small cell placement if right-of-way issues existed, but that much of the regulatory control was out of the hands of state and local officials.
In 2017 the RI General Assembly passed the Small Cell Citing Act which laid out the regulatory framework for telecommunications companies to install the small cells that emit 5G and 4G LTE signals. The act prevents cities and towns from placing blanket moratoriums on issuing permits for the cells, in effect giving companies control over cell construction. Municipalities can only block individual cell placements for right of way and historic preservation issues.
From the point of view of democracy, cities and towns, as well as the states, have the responsibility to look out for the well-being of their residents, said Resseger. This is not democracy. Who is calling the shots? Why should industry call the shots? People have serious concerns that are not being addressed and with no recourse.
In Massachusetts eight bills are under consideration in the 2019-2020 legislative session to do with the health effects of 5G and wireless technology. Other communities across the country have banned or postponed the installation of 5G until more research is completed.
Resseger and Stadtmueller said they would like to see a public forum with state and local officials to discuss the health worries surrounding 5G.
Representative Joe McNamara (D-19), agreed saying, There should be some type of venue where concerns can be heard.
6 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
Justanidiot
reichsfuhrer gigi is hearing your concerns. soon you will only be able to use paper and pencil to send notes via carrier rats to everyone because they are serving a home confinement sentence.
Thursday, May 7, 2020 Report this
JamesBruder
Where’s Robert and his Tin foil hat. This is right up his alley...
Thursday, May 7, 2020 Report this
cstadtmueller
I appreciate Mr. Schaeffer's giving me an opportunity to voice my concerns about 5G, but I will clarify that there have been ZERO studies that show safety of microwave radiation at 60 GHz. Sen. Blumenthal (CT) asked telecom representatives what studies they had done. ZERO was there answer. "So, we are flying blind," said the Senator.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w&t=57s "The WHO is researching the frequencies used by 5G, and plans to have a study out by 2022." So, 5G is already on poles in RI, but the studies won't be released until 2022? This is putting the cart before the horse, or profit for Telecom Industry before safety for citizens. If, as the WHO asserts, that "no other frequency of wireless signals is found to be dangerous for humans," then why were cell towers removed from fire stations in California in 2001, long before 5G? "Once cell towers were activated on or adjacent to their fire stations, they could no longer function without severe headache, inability to sleep, and foggy thinking. we found brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits." Yet, 5G is going outside of schools.
https://scientists4wiredtech.com/2018/07/firefighters-living-next-to-cell-towers-suffer-neurological-damage/
I have listened to countless hours of lectures by scientists and MDs on 5G. You can also. There is a FREE 5G Summit June 1-7. https://the5gsummit.com/ Think about it: the hundreds of scientists speaking out are making no money in doing so. The Telecom Industry is making billions. In fact, on 4/23/20, they asked the FCC for $9 billion to roll out 5G, despite having padded YOUR bill for YEARS with the unfulfilled promise of implementing SAFE fiberoptics network. Become aware! Let your elected officials know that you don't want 60 GHz pulsing your child's skull.
Thursday, May 7, 2020 Report this
Justanidiot
i would love to read these reports, but my internet connection is too slow. i am waiting for 5g to come to my neighborhood
Friday, May 8, 2020 Report this
bendover
The two most dangerous parts of 5G are the communist Chinese and using the WHO studies on 5G health on humans.
Saturday, May 9, 2020 Report this
wwkvoter
I think Ben's first concern means the chinese manufacturers could, at the behest of the commies, include "back door" access to the gear so as to enhance their already-capable electronic spying capability in other countries including ours. That is definitely a legit concern, they've already done it before.
Sunday, May 10, 2020 Report this