Report Inappropriate Comments

Hi Scal1024, I understand what you are saying. I am saying that in regards to the old infraction, if the guy was reprimanded/ punished/ disciplined they can't reprimand, punish or discipline him again for it. We have seen what happens if they do. They get all the back pay and their job back as happened with the city employee.

With regards to the new alleged charges, I believe the police and justice system will follow the protocols and if guilty, convict and sentence to the full extent of the law. If not guilty, the person should be able to move on with their life.

If not guilty and the schools make the mistake of releasing personnel records to the public they will be looking at an expensive lawsuit. If the previous records are relevant, make the lawyers put in a request and warrant to review the records and this takes the responsibility out of the schools and keeps the schools legally compliant. There will be no way he can turn around and sue the schools later.

I am dumbfounded to hear the city council wants to release personnel records of employees. Let's release all the personnel records of all employees and see what every employee makes, know how much over time they get, how much vacation time they get, look at how much vacation time they get, look at clothing allowances of city employees, etc. I'm all for that, we have the right to know don't we?

Has the city council president paid back her late taxes yet? She just voted to put a tax lien on 1500 houses in Warwick. Her house is not on the list. Why? http://www.abc6.com/story/24485689/warwick-city-council-president-behind-on-paying-her-taxes

Maybe they should have a no confidence vote for her?