Report Inappropriate Comments

Bravo Nadeau and Warwick Beacon!

Nadeau wasted an enormous amount of time, to point out all of the free services teachers provided (with a predetermined, sole purpose of trying to publicly slander the reputation of educators in the community) and the Warwick Beacon thought this was a great story to publish? Isn't that illegal? Is this guy ok? Why is he in charge of making any decisions for children? Nadeau's behavior, in this instance, makes him look like a villain. He is not looking for solutions or compromise. His agenda is evil, self serving and not in the best interest of the community or children. His is a horrible example for children by modeling highly inappropriate behavior (bullying) in a public forum. Nadeau made a weak attempt to try to sabotage and humiliate educators (and Warwick Beacon provided the forum for this sick agenda). As someone who agreed to "serve the public in making fair decisions that are good for children" perhaps Nadeau should make some changes in his own behaviors before publicly using the local newspaper to point out the flaws of others. He is certainly not perfect, so what makes his judgement credible? Is this a tabloid or a newspaper? This story made me sick. I hope you all sleep well at night publishing this type of garbage and labeling it "news". If this publication had any credibility, it would focus on articles about education that were informed, based on all of the facts (not purposefully leaving out relevant details) and writing stories focused on solutions for taxpayers and the children in the communities. It's clear that facts and solutions are not a priority (but rather some other selfish agendas) at the Warwick Beacon.