Report Inappropriate Comments

I too have to re-post my reply from the Solarize Article as CrickeeRaven has. Seems a bit of collusion going on between you and the Post. Its OK for the Warwick Post to refer to your Beacon comments as a source of information in their article and even include a link to the Beacon article, but they refuse to post my comment which found the error?

What a bunch of frauds and cowards at the Warwick Post.

What you CrickeeRaven fail to realize (or maybe you do realize) it was my comment that I posted (pending the editors approval, that never came) on the Warwick Post page that called out Rob Borkowski for his mistake. But in true cowardly fashion Borkowski or the editor or you, never posted my comment on the page that I intentional posted on this paper as proof of the error.

But they did write this statement to make it appear like they caught and fixed the error:

"Take a moment to re-read something that was just mentioned: The fiscal 2017 tax rate is lower than the FY2016 rate, meaning it fell, rather than increased. [Corrente is claiming 16 straight years of tax increases under Avedisian; as reported previously, fiscal 2017’s tax rate reduction and the recent revaluation of property means that the city will generate more tax revenue, which supports Corrente’s statement.]"

Before it read: “Take a moment to re-read something that was just mentioned: The fiscal 2017 tax rate is lower than the FY2016 rate, meaning it fell, rather than increased. [Corrente is claiming 16 straight years of tax increases under Avedisian; fiscal 2017 ends that streak, which goes unmentioned by Corrente.]”

Some Great Journalistic ethics at the Warwick Post. How can you believe anything that is written in the Warwick Post. Clearly Rob and the other member of the 2 man team have a political agenda.