Report Inappropriate Comments

Hello again Scal1024:

Yes, that was exactly my point, that this candidate never hesitates to post attacks against the current mayor on this site with specifics [although, as we have seen, nearly all of these attacks are false when held to the barest scrutiny] and then demands credit for making vague congratulatory statements that he insists include the mayor only after other users call him to account.

And thank you again for reminding readers of how thoroughly this candidate has refused to answer your very reasonable questions about how he might pay for these tax giveaways that are such a major part of his campaign. As a close reader of this site, you have seen his complete refusal to answer for the previous false statements he made about his property assessments and the state of Warwick's business sector.

I am sure you also recall how he has repeatedly claimed the city is in dire financial shape [yet another fraudulent claim, as the Beacon proved recently] while at the same time proposing steps that would further erode the city's revenue, and never acknowledging the contradiction in these ideas, except to further claim that he would somehow magically attract new taxpayers quickly enough to cover the shortfall.

I am reminded of a saying by the late Roy Rogers. who said: "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging."

Thank you for joining me and the thousands of voters in Warwick who will reject this candidate on Nov. 8.