Report Inappropriate Comments

What happened to and why no discussion of the story comparing Cranston and Warwick school systems and budgets? What happened to the story? Could the scribes on the school committee, the politicians taking up space in city hall or the Mayor explain how Cranston, with 1400 more students gets by with a budget $23M less than Warwick, or are those numbers as reported in that story all fuzzy? Please explain how this is possible? The overall demographics are near identical, including the fact that Cranston will soon be the second largest city....why the huge difference in budgets in very similar school systems with Warwick trailing in the number of students? Economically, this just doesn't make sense, and we are talking bonds of $200M for building? Shear madness....