Report Inappropriate Comments

Well, well, well Crickee. It seems that your astute observation brings in to question of the fake mayor's campaign expenditures and his tax default to an entire different level now doesn't it? It would appear, since the fake homeless fiscally dysfunctional mayor had his taxes paid by someone other than himself, then raised money in a campaign account, then cut a check to that same person from his campaign account, it certainly raises the question of quid pro quo. Now, being of sound mind I would offer for the record that if in fact the fake mayor was paying rent to this individual, that we would see numerous rent checks for his "failed campaign office", paid on the same day each month. However, knowing the BS and outright delusions that come from the mouth of Mayor Dumbness, he probably has convinced himself that no one would question this type of anomaly. I would stipulate for the record that a third party would be necessary to perform adequate research to confirm or deny proper adherence to state and local campaign laws. You know, just for a healthy civics argument.