Report Inappropriate Comments

Hello again Scal1024:

Thank you for your kind compliments.

In fact, the fake "mayor" did respond to the question raised in prior comments, at this link: http://warwickonline.com/stories/4th-quarter-honors-announced-at-pilgrim-high,126494?#comments

Here is the relevant excerpt: "Clay Shackleton bought the tax bill at a tax sale and my lender, by law, had one year to redeem. While they were doing this they were court-ordered to negotiate "in good faith" with me. I contend that they did not but I can't comment further because that part of the lawsuit is still on-going."

[Online city records show that Mr. Shackleton is the payer of record for property taxes in 2014 and 2015 on the claimed residence of the fake "mayor." During that time, he was listed as owner of the property, prior to its 2015 transfer to Red Stick Acquisitions for $0.]

Perhaps you agree that this comment does not actually address the core issue of the losing candidate using campaign funds to pay rent in 2016 to the same person who had taken ownership of his property through tax sale in 2013.

Like you and Thecaptain, I agree that further review of these activities by an outside organization may be warranted.