Report Inappropriate Comments

Justanidiot:

Well, he certainly isn't sparing any effort to keep writing false statements, like this one: " Warwick has fallen to third for the first time ever."

This is false. A recent Beacon article on the changes in Warwick's and Cranston's population -- which, of course, the make-believe mayor tried to dispute with fake numbers -- explained that Cranston had a higher population in 1950, and here I'll quote that article: "when Cranston had an estimated population of 55,060 and Warwick had 43,028. Warwick surpassed Cranston as of the 1960 census with 68,504 residents to Cranston’s 66,766."

So no, this is not the "first time ever" that Warwick has been listed behind Cranston in the state's population list.

Given how much effort he puts into being wrong, the make-believe mayor clearly has no capacity left to offer anything approaching legitimate ideas -- which is why, as Scal correctly points out, he is reduced to begging other people for theirs. And as Scal rightly pointed out in another comment, the make-believe mayor is the candidate, so -- despite what he seems to believe -- the burden is on him to justify and defend his plans, not on other people to simply accept them.