Report Inappropriate Comments

Scal, I'm not sure it can be called confusion when someone is so intentionally dense as the two-time election reject.

As we see on this page, he's taken to complaining [disguised as chest-puffing bluster] about the attention he gets on this website, and yet he's the one making blatantly false statements and somehow expecting that no one will respond to them.

If readers of this site were so "dear" to him, he'd stop lying to them. It's as simple as that.

So, for example, to get back to the topic of this article, the two-time election reject could simply say he doesn't support fixing local schools because he, personally, doesn't trust the school committee.

Objectively, that's a terrible take. But it would be more honest than spinning this conspiracy theory that the school committee is somehow "not accountable," based mainly on his own decision to ignore publicly available independent audits and annual budgets.

Bottom line is, the schools need to be fixed. Mayor Solomon is involved in the process and is making a commitment to provide city oversight of how the bonds will be spent.

Having the two-time reject try to cloud the issue with his name-calling and false accusations against the school board is worthless in terms of how it affects the process, or anyone's opinion of it.

I expect that voters will approve the bonds next Tuesday, proving how worthless they consider the two-time reject's opinions.