Report Inappropriate Comments

And ThatGuy, look at how you drew out the two-time election reject to willingly prove his delusional ideas.

He received just 600 more votes [14,086 to 13,481] than Stenhouse in 2016, where turnout for the mayor's race was 65%, while this year's turnout was 50 percent.

Stenhouse got a higher percentage of the vote [39.7 to 34.8] and spent less money [$15,000 to $40,000] than the two-time election reject.

So, Stenhouse spent less than half the money, campaigned for four months, didn't spend her time peddling lies on the Beacon website, ran in an election with fewer overall voters -- and finished within 5 percent of his vote total in 2016 and actually captured a higher percentage of votes.

Don't be fooled by his spin. His two campaigns resulted in blowout losses; he should not be credited with anything except wasting money and time to run a lie-filled campaign that our honest, taxpaying neighbors saw through and rejected as a direct result.

His failed slogan did not get him elected, and it will not make any difference in any election, except to result in an even more overwhelming and humiliating loss for him if he runs again.