Report Inappropriate Comments

Oh, and Scal, let's review this claim by the two-time election reject: "There isn't a piece of real estate in all of Warwick that can say that" it is assessed at less than its price when sold to its current owner.

So, one would think that finding another property that currently has a lower assessment than its original purchase price would be difficult.

As a matter of fact, I didn't have to look any further than his own former residence, which city records show he purchased in 2007 for $365,000 and is currently assessed at... $357,200.

That assessment value is, if I may use the two-time election reject's own words, LESS THAN HE PAID FOR IT.

You can search this website for this property to find the factual information: https://gis.vgsi.com/warwickri/Search.aspx

I am sure the two-time election reject will readily admit this fraud that he has perpetrated on the city, just as he has accused Mayor Solomon of doing...

No, wait, I'm sure he'll stop screeching about Solomon having exactly the same sorts of changes in his property assessments as the two-time election reject...

No, wait, I'm absolutely certain he will drop this issue altogether because property values don't follow sale prices, and having current assessments that are lower than original sale prices are nothing out of the ordinary...

No, wait, I'm convinced that he will finally admit that using tax assessments as an attack line is useless, because for every example he twists into a claim of his, another example can be found to disprove it...

Actually, I take that all back.

The two-time election reject has proven that all he can do is humiliate himself with disgraceful and false statements, and as long as there's a way to further disgrace himself, he'll enthusiastically embrace it.