Weather Forecast
44°, light rain
Cat, I just checked my calendar -- it's not 2002 any more. People using screen names on websites is nothing new, nor does it mean anything as far as credibility it concerned, despite what the two-time election reject says.
In fact, he has so often, so willingly, and so consciously posted lies on this website that nothing he says can be trusted -- and, in fact, by putting his name to those lies, he ensured two overwhelming and humiliating losses at the polls for himself.
When he whines about "anonymous critics," what he's really doing is hiding from the truth that has been presented about him time and again.
For instance, his BANKRS registration was not active in Warwick from 2013 to 2015. This is not a lie, as he claims -- the facts are readily available on this website:
https://www.citizenselfservice.com/MSSProd/citizens/MotorVehicle/Default.aspx
No "anonymous critic" put this information online -- the city of Warwick did.
The fact is, he is not credible. He can't complete a sentence without it being wrong somehow.
And to put himself in the same sentence as those others, who actually provide proof and evidence for their claims [while their conclusions may be debatable], is yet further proof of his delusional view of himself.
He demands apologies, yet has never apologized for all of his false accusations against the last two mayors -- both of whom thoroughly defeated him in back-to-back elections.
If the two-time election reject were credible, one would think he'd at least get more votes from one election to another -- but he didn't, because he isn't.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
