Report Inappropriate Comments

Dear Readers,

Taxes in Cranston are less than Warwick. That is a fact. (as any Realtor). My critics will try to get you to believe otherwise, but they lie. They use fake names so they don't have to be accountable. I am accountable, therefore I don't have the need to hide like they do. The taxes in any city are based on three things. The assessed value (something that Warwick has widespread variances on), the tax rate, and the percent-of-tax-assessed value used. Combine all these confusing factors and cities and towns are able to claim they are saving taxpayers money when they really are NOT. Look at the bottom line. Go to Zillow. Find 2 comparative properties, commercial or residential, and I promise the taxes will be less in the Cranston property. That is why, in my opinion, Warwick is losing population (5,800 in the last ten years according to the U.S. Census) and Cranston is gaining.

Now, if my "loyal" critics want to dispute my numbers and call me lies like a "tax cheat" I don't give a damn. They don't have the courage to speak unless it is from the shadows of a fake name. They don't exist in the real world. They are afraid of it. In the real world, they would have to be accountable. Cowards.

But they keep giving my ideas massive publicity even as they condemn and complain about my every comment. For that I thank them, whoever they are.

Merry Christmas cowardly CrickeeRaven (AKA Mark Carruolo)

Merry Christmas cowardly Cat2222.

Merry Christmas cowardly WwkVoter.

Merry Christmas cowardly FASTFREDWARD4.

Merry Christmas (sincerely) to Justanidiot, my old friend.

Merry Christmas readers.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor