Weather Forecast
60°, a few clouds
Justanidiot, this is getting so predictable.
I said the double election reject would falsely claim that lower taxes led this new restaurant to open in Cranston -- and he did.
I said the lower taxed in Cranston don't exist -- and they don't.
Warwick's commercial tax rate is lower than Cranston's: $30.36 vs. $34.41.
He also compounds his lie with an unsourced, unsupported claim that taxes in Cranston are "sometimes less than half" than in Warwick.
The only way that would happen is if the Cranston property were assessed at half the value as a Warwick property. Otherwise, it would be illogical and dishonest to compare differently-assessed properties in the two cities.
As we know, it is not at all out of character for the double election reject with the make-believe title to repeat his lies and make dishonest comparisons, providing further evidence that we and our honest, taxpaying neighbors were 100% correct to reject his candidacy twice.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
