Report Inappropriate Comments

Dear Mr. Corrente:

Thank you for your reply which even more so validates my previous comments factual.

In your above reply, you state you have no political intentions. Yet you signed your comments "Richard Corrente, The Taxpayer's Mayor" And you advocated for the city to spend millions of dollars of taxpayer's monies when there is a law that other parties are the one's responsible for the work that needs to be done in the watershed. That is not in the taxpayer's interest Rick.

You are advocating support for project where even the sponsor themselves testified that they do not have the fund to complete a successful project. You are advocating support for a project that the sponsor testified has to be multi-year to succeed, yet they are limiting their scope to less than one year. The sponsor testified that the actual scope is insufficient for a successful program. So you support wasting taxpayer money on a proposal that even the sponsor testified they are not doing the scope that is required for a successful project.

So you refuse to offer evidence of what you claimed. That's because you exaggerated. That's fine as I have multiple years of aerial images showing what is happening in the watershed. There is no emergency as your associates claim

Actually, your response shows your true nature. With that I'd just ask that you really try and undde

What is proposed is a band aid that will fail.

You should also know that I support a remedy that will work.

Dear Michael Zarum,

You couldn't be more wrong.

I have no political intentions. None. I am a concerned citizen that doesn't even live abutting Warwick Pond. I just care. Deal with it. If you can't then don't read my stuff. As far a proving the flooded backyards to you, who the hell do you think you are? I don't have to prove ANYTHING to you. You can, however, politely, contact Phil Dercole and politely request pictures. There are many. These homeowners are not the very wealthy you spoke against in your comment. They are innocent taxpayers that have legitimate damages that could have been avoided. I recommend that we go back and remove the phragmites LEGALLY. To suggest that I was considering doing it illegally is stupid Mike. Don't make comments that are stupid. One more thing. Don't accuse me of misinforming the public or promoting myself. I am stating my opinion. If you don't like that; if it bothers you in any way shape or form...GOOD! I'm not running for any office. Got that?

Happy St. Patricks everyone.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor

From: Phragmites removal in Buckeye Brook to cost about $825K

Please explain the inappropriate content below.