Report Inappropriate Comments

I've read this article several more times, and I'm more confused than I was on Tuesday.

First, I see this:

"However, due to revenue coming in at $2.8 million higher than projected and expenses coming in $1.1 million under expectations, the fund balance was not needed to draw from in FY19."

And then, I read this:

"The audit shows that total revenue in the city decreased from $360 million in FY17 to $352 million in FY18. Total expenses also decreased from $373.3 million in FY17 to $367.9 million FY18."

So, did the city lose $8 million in revenue or add $2.8 million?

And did spending go down by $5.4 million or $1.1 million?

Either way, the audit's numbers are different from the mayor's, and there's no explanation why.