Report Inappropriate Comments

It was only a few years ago that binding arbitration was strongly opposed by R.I. public unions. If a reasonable person examines the history of how binding arbitration has worked,particularly with Federal contracts,one will see that the results have been fair..Indeed,when a three member arbitration panel is used,with each side choosing an arbitrator,and agreeing on a third,the negotiations are seriousEach side realizes that the neutral arbitrator could,and often does,remove,or lower, long held benefits on labors side,or make new language that the arbitration panel deems for the public good.All of this is done within the parameters of realistic budget constraints. The motivation to reach an agreement prior to arbitration most often leads to a fair agreement for both sides.Binding arbitration would not take power away from elected officials.It would force both sides to negotiate in good faith.Again,rather than using the issue as a political lightning rod,check out the history of binding arbitration when a three member panel is used.