Report Inappropriate Comments

Bob, if you read what I said...I asked back "telling someone they are a coward for not speaking at city hall???" I then asked the question is it then ok for me to attack you for not running? The very next thing I said after that was "you sound ridiculous". Which was meant to say that argument is ridiculous. I have defended your right to speak, asked the question " what does it hurt?" by you presenting, ripped the mayor and donna travis for their lack of respect, ripped people in attendance who were disrespectful and have never challenged a single number you put out. Personal attacks? You would have to refresh my memory. You should not judge based on what you think someone believes.

I have also asked what's realistic in terms of gaining concessions? I believe there is a problem. I have repeatedly said however, that in order to fix the problem the city is going to have to negotiate. Seriously negotiate. I think you misunderstood my last comment, it wasn't meant as a shot at you. Just telling others (some you may know) that not everybody is available to attend meetings. Am I a coward for working? Earning a living? Whether you acknowledge it or not the folks around you sometimes cloud ypur message. You can't say you care about city employees, and then drive around in a truck recording them, waiting for anything you can find to try and get them terminated. People resent that. I appreciate the fact you stood up to get a conversation started. My question is, how does it get fixed without a give and take with the unions?

From: Debate continues over plan for rising legacy costs

Please explain the inappropriate content below.