To the Editor:
1. Misnomer: A misapplied or inappropriate name or designation
2. Misleading: Deceptive, tending to mislead
Boutique:
a) A small shop or specialty development
b) Any …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
To the Editor:
1. Misnomer: A misapplied or inappropriate name or designation
2. Misleading: Deceptive, tending to mislead
Boutique:
a) A small shop or specialty development
b) Any small, exclusive business offering customized service
c) A small business development
d) Designation or characteristic of a small exclusive business or producer
Apponaug Waterfront Development, LLC seems of the opinion that requesting the construction of a 127-unit monstrosity, as opposed to their rejected request for 187 units, somehow allows for the term “Boutique Hotel.”
Lynn Potter-Vosselman
Warwick
2 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
patientman
According to wikipedia a typical boutique hotel is the Madison hotel in Memphis that has 110 rooms. 127 seems in line with that. Mrs. Vosselman appears she doesn't know as much as she thinks. Sounds like she's a NIMBY.
Monday, July 8, 2013 Report this
FASTFREDWARD4
We need more big units in warwick 2nd city if you don.t like it PUT SELL ON HOUSE GO SOUTH>
Sunday, July 14, 2013 Report this